Public Health Programs Require Less Per-Person Spending Than Private Plans

Armen Hareyan's picture

"Public and Private Insurance: Stacking Up the Costs," Health Affairs: The Web exclusive study -- by Leighton Ku, a professor at the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, and Matthew Broaddus, a research analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities -- finds that providing health coverage to low-income people through public programs such as Medicaid and SCHIP, rather than through private health plans, results in lower per-person medical spending and out-of-pocket expenses.

For example, the study finds that total spending to provide full-year Medicaid coverage for an average low-income uninsured adult would have been $3,084 in 2005, compared with $3,899 for private coverage.

Annual out-of-pocket expenses for a Medicaid beneficiary would have totaled $109, compared with $771 for those enrolled in private health plans, according to the study (Ku/Broaddus, Health Affairs release, 6/24).

Reprinted with permission from You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, and sign up for email delivery at . The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Share this content.

If you liked this article and think it may help your friends, consider sharing or tweeting it to your followers.