Health Insurance Drives Newborn Care With Congenital Defects
In a study that sheds light on how insurance coverage may drive health care and may reveal an unexpected result for the uninsured, a team of Yale School of Medicine and Yale-New Haven Children’s Hospital physicians has found that babies from uninsured families who are born with congenital defects are far more likely than those whose families have insurance to be transferred out of the large community hospitals where they are born and into children¹s hospitals for corrective surgery.
Paradoxically, these uninsured babies may receive better care at the children’s hospitals, which are fully staffed with pediatric specialists, say the researchers.
The team’s data were presented at the 40th annual meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association in Puerto Rico on May 30.
The Yale team studied around 6,000 infants with major congenital defects of the abdomen and esophagus, born in community hospitals between 1997 and 2006. During that period they saw a steady increase in the trend of uninsured pediatric patients being transferred, while insured patients were treated locally. By 2006, the uninsured babies were three times as likely as the insured to be sent to children’s hospitals.
Treatment of newborns with complex congenital anomalies requiring urgent surgical care is among the most costly challenges for the health care system. The mean hospitalization cost per patient is more than $155,000, with care for some infants rising above $1 million.
Because of this, "care of newborns with major anomalies can produce either a huge financial gain or loss to a hospital depending upon the patient’s insurance status," according to corresponding author R. Lawrence Moss, MD, the Robert Pritzker Professor and Chief of Pediatric Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, and Surgeon-in-Chief of Yale-New Haven Children¹s Hospital. "The current reimbursement structure in the U.S. provides the incentive," he adds.
The authors acknowledge that their study did not address whether babies treated at children¹s hospitals had better outcomes than babies treated at community hospitals. However, other studies have shown this to be the case. Moss and co-author Loren Berman, MD, of the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars program state that any disparity in care that is based on insurance status is unacceptable, and likely has an overall negative effect on the care of children.
Dr. Moss says, "A disturbing implication of our findings is that children¹s hospitals are being asked to shoulder a disproportionate burden of caring for these uninsured babies without the appropriate reimbursement. This threatens the viability of all children¹s hospitals in the United States and reduces their ability to meet the needs of our kids."