75 Percent of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy - The Same Percentage Recommend It To Patients

Jen Slack's picture
Doctors and chemotherapy recommendations

I ran across this statistic for the first time a few days ago and found it quite puzzling. Why would such a large percentage of doctors refuse a treatment that they would recommend to others?

Advertisement

The study that revealed this curious statistic was from Stanford, where more than 1000 doctors were surveyed.

The old slogan - "Cancer can be beaten"

"Cancer can be beaten", is what they used to say, when I was growing up in the late 1970's. It was a positive and a definite message to assure those who donated money that their money would find the cure and that cancer would be eradicated. Yet today, the most widely diagnosed treatment would be refused by the majority of doctors and oncologists.

Today, there doesn't seem to be any memorable slogans with any promises being touted. There are just new, creative ways to inspire people to give - ribbon campaigns, grow your mustache, take part in a run and a host of others with the hope that money for more research will continue to pour in.

In 1971, US President Richard Nixon declared a 'war on cancer', yet cancer is still the number 2 killer. I don't even want to get into the depressing amount of dollars spent trying to find a cure. One we start using the term billions, most of us average people can't comprehend that numbers anyway. So let's just say "billions and billions and billions and billions and billions" - every year - times more than half a century -just in the USA.

Also depressing, is the rate that chemotherapy actually cures cancer. It's barely over 2 percent.

According to this study, chemotherapy is of no use to someone with late stage cancer.

Side Effects of Chemotherapy

The list of possible side effects effects from chemotherapy is a long one.

Mouth and throat sores.

Causing damage the cells inside the mouth and throat, painful sores can errupt, which can get infected. Mouth stores appear 5 to 14 days after treatment and continue during chemotherapy, but usually cease when the chemotherapy is finished.

The pain from these sores can be treated with drugs.

Diarrhea
This symptom can be treated with drugs.
.

Nausea and vomiting
This symptom can be treated with drugs.

Constipation
Can be treated with drugs.

Blood disorders

Your bone marrow makes new blood cells while chemo affects this process. The blood cells return to normal after chemotherapy. However, this condition can be treated with drugs. However, the side effects from the drugs used to treat the blood disorders can cause nervous system disorders.

Symptoms of the drugs that treat the nervous system disorders are:

  • Tingling
  • Burning
  • Weakness or numbness in the hands, feet, or both
  • Weak, sore, tired, or achy
  • Loss of balance
  • Shaking or trembling
  • Stiff neck
  • Headache
  • Vision problems
  • Hearing Problems
  • Feeling clumsy and walking problems
  • Changes in thinking and memory
  • Sexual and reproductive issues
  • Weight loss and loss of appetite
  • Hair loss
  • Damage to reproductive system
  • Heart problems

Many of these side effects stop after chemotherapy, however, some of the damage, like damage to the heart, lung, liver, or reproductive system can be permanent. As well, for years or months after the treatment, some still report problems with their memory, concentration or thinking.

Advertisement

Obviously, chemotherapy is a process that will a serious toll on the cancer patient. And with a low success rate, it's no wonder why so many doctors surveyed would refuse this treatment. One might wonder why it is called a treatment at all.

Personally, I have already made the decision that if I ever get any kind of cancer diagnosis, I will not be doing any chemotherapy.

But what about others who opt to undergo this treatment. Are they hopeful? Are they too hopeful?

High Hopes

An interesting article from the website ChrisBeatCancer.com
delves into this matter of hope and what the cancer patient expects. The owner of the website, cites a study and survey, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, and says this about it.

"The following survey and study mirrors what I experienced as a patient back in 2004. My onocologist was not honest with me about my chances of survival with chemotherapy and this study validates what I’ve been saying for years."

Findings from the study

1 ) A huge number of those with advanced cancer thought the chemo they were getting might cure them, despite the fact that the chemo they were getting was actually being done to buy them some time or make them comfortable.

"Comfortable?" Really? Reread above list of symptoms from chemotherapy.

2) Sixty nine percent of terminally ill lung cancer and 81 percent with terminal colorectal cancer did not realize that the chemotherapy would not likely eliminate their tumors.

It seems that many patients believe that they will beat the odds. Hossein Borghaei, an oncologist at the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, elaborated about the problem, “What are you supposed to do, stand in front of someone with advance disease and argue with them? It’s not productive.... But I hear that all the time, especially from the younger patients.

Read this New York Times article about the huge profit, in the range of millions per year, that doctors can make on chemotherapy drugs. Then take a look again at the long list of side effects caused by chemotherapy.

Read here about a Michigan doctor who was falsely diagnosing people with cancer and recommending treatment for profit.

Or about this Michigan doctor who did the same thing.

And while this doctor's actions are reprehensible, what about those doctors who just make mistakes and make incorrect diagnoses of cancer. It's estimated that as many as 20 percent of cancer cancer are misdiagnosed, according to these studies.

What is going on? Why after the many decades of research do doctors still recommend treatments that cause so much damage to people, especially when they might not undergo that treatment for themselves?

The saying "get a second opinion" is rarely heard anymore, yet so important. If you were diagnosed with a serious illness, would you get a second opinion?

In speaking with some friends about the article, we got on the topic of conversation about senior patients, who will accept the word of their doctor without question. My friends were saying this was true of older patients, but is age really a factor in this blind trust of the opinions of their doctor?

Please weigh in with questions and comments.

Read here about how an abortion raises the risk of breast cancer.

Share this content.

If you liked this article and think it may help your friends, consider sharing or tweeting it to your followers.
Advertisement

Comments

Not only recommend, they're pushing it! For no sound reason other than statistics.
Strange isn't it?
We had an oncologist in our group and when asked about cancer and chemotherapy, she said that many times the cancer can be treated naturally except that the insurance will not pay for it but will pay for chemotherapy.
What kind of group were you in? I am surprised that an oncologist is admitting this public, although it does happen. On the videos the Truth About Cancer, some oncologists are also speaking out. At least one was even saying that they were having great results naturally, but the FDA raided their offices and took their research.
Chemo and radiation coupled with immunotherapy has prolonged my life for 5 years and counting. I’m quite certain I would not be here writing this if not for these treatments. Until you’re faced with life or death it’s hard to say what you would do. I choose life.
I agree for you to choose life and I am glad to hear you had positive results.
Oops I had made an error earlier. Corrected.
I was diagnosed with cancer a year ago. I underwent surgery and add a satisfactory result in the removal of the tumor and currently have no evidence of recurrence. It was suggested to me that I take chemo but after doing my own independent research I refused. The oncologist was unhappy with me and made that quite clear. The surgeon however and my primary care physician both agreed with me that I would be fine without chemo and they wouldn’t take it either. I change my lifestyle, my diet and my attitude. I was recently sitting in the oncologist office for my one year check up and there were a number of patients there who are receiving chemo. Their caregivers who accompanied them asked me who I was with either my spouse or a family member when I told him that I was the patient they were astounded because I looked like I had absolutely nothing wrong with me and all of their loved ones who were taking chemo look like walking death. While I was initially going to say I looked good because I didn’t take chemo I refrained since it would have been devastating to those people who are currently in treatment but this was just another validation of the fact that I had made a good choice for me. The more I have research this in my own way the more confident I am that the choices I made will serve me well in the long run. But it is absolutely necessary to make diet changes remove all sugars and processed foods and eat only the most natural products in order to allow your body and your immune system to perform most efficiently to a Raticate the cancer itself. Naturally this is just one person‘s experience and opinion but it certainly is indicative that just blindly following the suggestions of a Doctor Who isn’t going to suffer the consequences of poor decisions is not the most prudent way to take care of yourself.
I keep hearing more and more about sugar. I try to stay away, for the most part, but I keep hearing it actually feeds cancer cells. Maybe an upcoming article will cover this. Thank you so much for your comments.