EmaxHealth Health News
Home » General Health » Drug Clinical Trials

Effectiveness Of Blood Substitute Examined In Large Clinical Trial

Ads by Google

All About:
  • Drug Clinical Trials

By Armen Hareyan on June 17, 2008 - 9:54am for eMaxHealth

A predicted shortfall of more than 4 million units of blood worldwide is driving the need to develop an alternative to red blood cells.

In a recently concluded Phase 3 multicenter clinical trial, academic and industry researchers found the use of up to three units of a blood substitute to be relatively safe in patients under 80 with a moderate need for transfusions.

Published in the June edition of the Journal of Trauma, the study, which was conducted at 46 sites in the United States, Europe and South Africa, is the first Phase 3 trial to compare a blood substitute to regular blood.

"The majority of patients who received the blood substitute did well," said Dr. Jonathan Jahr, professor of clinical anesthesiology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and lead author of the study.

The six-week study involved 688 patients, age 18 and older, who were undergoing elective orthopedic surgery, procedures that often have a high need for blood transfusions. Patients initially received either one unit (32.5 grams) of real blood or two units (65 grams) of the blood-substitute product HBOC-201, a hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier manufactured by Biopure Corp.

Made from a bovine source after multiple purifications, HBOC-201 can be kept at room temperature for up to three years and does not need to be matched to one's blood type.

Patients in the HBOC-201 group could receive up to 10 units of the blood substitute during a six-day period, while those in the regular-blood group could receive unlimited transfusions. Subjects were evaluated daily and six weeks post-operatively.

"We found that we eliminated the need for blood transfusions for 59 percent of the 350 patients who received the blood substitute," said study author Dr. Colin F. Mackenzie, professor and former director of the National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. "The blood substitute worked best in those under 80 years old with a moderate transfusion need."

For those over 80 with more acute health issues and higher transfusion needs, the blood substitute did not work as well as blood. As a result, many of these patients were crossed over into the other group to receive regular blood.

A number of adverse events involving the cardiac and central nervous systems were found in 21 of these older patients receiving the blood substitute. Analysis revealed that the issues were due to advanced age, heart failure or possibly undertreatment.

"For this specific older acute patient population, we suggest using a blood substitute only if blood is not available. These patients also need to be carefully monitored for vascular volume status and avoidance of fluid overload," said study author Dr. A. Gerson Greenburg, vice president of medical affairs at Biopure.

Mortality rates among those with moderate transfusion needs in both study groups were low -- at 1 percent. The higher transfusion-need groups reported a 5-percent mortality rate in the blood-substitute group and a 3-percent rate in the group receiving regular blood, which are comparable, according to researchers.

Many of the less serious adverse effects seen in the overall group receiving the blood substitute were due to temporary, expected physiological effects of this class of drugs, which can include skin discoloration interpreted as jaundice, elevation of blood pressure and an increase in levels of the enzymes troponin and lipase.

"Although these temporary side effects didn't lead to any clinical problems in most patients, these should be studied in future trials," said UCLA's Jahr.

The majority of the 350 patients in the study arm using the blood substitute received an average of five or less units. On average, the 338 patients receiving regular blood were given less than two units.

"This product has a definite place where blood is not an option -- such as in patients whose immune system attacks red blood cells or those whose religion forbids blood transfusions -- and in situations where blood is not available," Mackenzie said.

Source: 
UCLA Healthcare

eMaxHealth welcomes yourcomments and feedback on this story without registration, but keep the comments meaningful please. Links are not accepted.

  • Add new comment

Similar Stories

  • Medical Research in 2012 a Risk to the United States
  • Dexpramipexole promising in phase II trial for Lou Gehrig's disease
  • Lilly drug evacetrapib dramatically raises HDL cholesterol in trial
  • Genzyme’s MS Drug Lemtrada Gets Positive Results in Clinical Trial
  • Vorapaxar TRACER study halted after safety review

 Dr. Oz Promotes Magnet Cure
 Skin Care Secrets in Your Kitchen
 3 Gadgets to Make You Look 10 Years Younger
 Catalase is the Culprit for Gray Hair
 Vibration Therapy Helps Chronic Pain
 What If Antidepressants Don't Work
 When Obesity is OK for Some

Health Categories

 EMAXHEALTH HOME
 AFFORDABLE HEALTH INSURANCE
 DIET & WEIGHT LOSS
 FITNESS & EXERCISE
 MEN'S HEALTH
 WOMEN'S HEALTH
 BEAUTY
 ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE
 CANCER TREATMENT
 AGING
 DISEASE and CONDITION
 MENTAL HEALTH
 GENERAL HEALTH
 PERSONAL HEALTH
 GOURMET FOOD & HEALTH
 HEALING & SPIRITUALITY
 MONEY AND HEALTH
 Comment Moderation
  • Health RSS Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • About Us
  • Editorial Review Process
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Contributors
Copyright eMaxhealth.com 2005-2012. All rights reserved.

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.